admin 管理员组

文章数量: 887021


2023年12月17日发(作者:fseek一般用于二进制文件)

It is widely believed that children of different

levels of intelligence should be taught

together, while others think that more

intelligent children should be taught

separately.

Discuss and present your own opinion. Which

one do your support? You should write at least

250 words. Give reasons for your answer and

include any relevant examples from your own

knowledge or experience.

Model Answer 1:

In the past in many educational institutions

children have been taught together based on

their age regardless of intellectual ability

displayed at schools. Alternatively, a large

proportion of the population believes there

should be a strong move towards the separation

of children of different intellectual capabilities in

current educational institutions. From my own

educational perspective, I honestly believe that

younger students possessing higher intelligence

levels than their peers ought to be separated

into alternative levels based on their gift, for a

number of reasons.

Admittedly, although young learners have the

chance to learn a lot from associating with

classmates their own age, it is widely believed

that such a process isn’t considered to be vital

for a healthy educational upbringing. The

argument for intellectual separation holds some

strong advantages.

Firstly, by allocating students to classes based

on levels of intelligence, high achievers have the

opportunity to excel in a way that they couldn’t in

a normal class. Owing to the fact that they can

be placed into an unrestricted educational

environment, students can excel with intellectual

freedom.

Secondly, there is a strong argument in regards

to inhibiting a child’s intellectual growth by

restricting them from moving above their peers if

their mental capability permits. Why should we

limit the intelligence of our future generation?

For instance, many of today’s highly successful

artists and entrepreneurs in the world have

come from an unrestricted educational

background and have been allowed to explore

their mind and careers to the fullest extent.

In conclusion, although I believe an educational

environment for young learners should promote

equal opportunity, I honestly think that creating a

more liberal environment which enhances the

learning capabilities of intellectually-gifted

children will not only benefit individual’s careers

but future society as a whole.

Model Answer 2:

Separating students by their level of intelligent

is suggested by some experts. Yet, taking this

idea into practice is still a controversial issue.

Some people claim that it is much more justified

for genius pupils, whilst other perspective rejects

this suggestion and persists on the idea of

unseparated schools. Personally, I do believe

that all pupils should be taught in the same

group.

It is thought that separating children by the

factor of intelligence could have better

consequences. If the students being segregated,

teachers have more capability to teach subjects

in higher levels and this wouldn`t make classes

monotonous for good students. In particular,

mathematic classes could be an interesting

class which is broadening the horizons of

intelligent pupils in the case of separation.

Although in one view separating student is an

advisable project, others, on the hand, believe

that not only is this idea broadcasting the

hopeless among regular students, but also it

refers the share of nurture in education. What

makes a pupil a prosperous student is a

stimulating environment in school and it is

possible by some education of both genius and

ordinary children. In the other words, if the

students do not being separated, the feel of

competitiveness

promotion.

will definitely help their

To conclude, all the above-mentioned points

are in my own perspective rarely do segregation

of children influence on positive ways if the

whole students are taken into account.


本文标签: 用于 文件 二进制 作者